GapLimit

Ownership · On-chain evidence

Whale intelligence without whale theatre

How to classify large transfers using KNOWN, PROBABLE, POSSIBLE and UNKNOWN—without inventing motive.

A blockchain shows movement. It rarely prints intent.

Why it matters

Large-transfer alerts become useful only when evidence grade and alternative explanations travel with the number.

KNOWN

Use KNOWN only when an entity has publicly verified an address, a court or regulator has established control, or a transaction is tied to a documented event. Keep the date and scope attached.

PROBABLE

Use PROBABLE for multiple independent signals such as repeated deposit patterns, clustering and confirmed counterparties. Explain the inference and recognize that service wallets aggregate many users.

POSSIBLE

A familiar transaction size, timing coincidence or one analyst label is POSSIBLE at best. Labels propagate between databases and can create false certainty.

UNKNOWN—and honest

Unknown is a result, not a failure. Report asset, amount, time, confirmed endpoints and plausible non-exclusive explanations; then wait for stronger evidence before assigning motive.

Source trail

Follow the thread